Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
Re: [OT]Re: Network problems
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT]Re: Network problems




On Mar 1, 2005, at 9:38 PM, Graham J Lee wrote:

On 1 Mar 2005, at 20:40, Jurvis LaSalle wrote:

On Mar 1, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Graham J Lee wrote:

On 1 Mar 2005, at 16:53, Felix Kronlage wrote:
I actually think, it's not that great idea to crosspost between mailing-lists from different sites... (but that might be just me)

I disagree, but apologise if I'm in the wrong.

The problem with cross-posting is that most people are not subscribed to both lists.

I actually count that as a benefit. If the same people were on both lists, then there'd be no point x-posting as they'd all receive the same mail twice.


Hence, the suggestions and threads get quickly out of hand with content coming from one list or the other and being snipped and quoted in a manner that frustrates someone actually trying to follow the thread. It's cool to post the same question to different lists and see what you get, just don't CC them together...


Whether I CC both lists or send the same question twice is a matter of MTA overloading. As I run my MTS I don't care how much extraneous data I send ;-)


I think we should agree that I sent the same data on two occasions and hence close the thread before the moderators do ;-)

Cheers,
--
Hi,
I don't mean to be a dick or overly insistent, but I don't think you caught my gist (because I didn't explain it very well). It's not about the load on the mail servers at all. It's about a person from list A reading a message cross-posted to lists A and B, perhaps seeing a response from a member of list A, and then a follow-up from the original poster [OP] which quotes a reply (or three) he got on a list B. Since most lists require you to be subscribed to post your reply, the reply posted to list B never appeared on list A. This causes a discontinuity in the thread which can often be many responses deep. If the OP is properly quoting and snipping and everyone is either top-posting or bottom-posting, this isn't necessarily so bad (it would actually be pretty good). This is a very big if however and you rarely see it ever work out so well (even on one list!). I know that newsgroup readers abhor multi-posting but I feel that it's the only logical way to go on mailing lists. I strive to make the mailing lists I participate in a valuable resource that can be archived and searched to help solve problems. The discontinuities introduced from cross-posting only increase the chance that you're archiving a rat's nest of a thread.
I stfw looking for corroboration for multi-posting on mailing lists and didn't find much. In the two years I've been using mailing lists I have always gotten the sense that cross-posting is a no no. Am I wrong? How come there isn't mailing list netiquette FAQ somewhere detailing the pros and cons? or did I just miss it?


thanks and sorry for wasting everyone's precious time,
Jurvis LaSalle


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwinos-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Fwd: Network problems (From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Network problems (From: Felix Kronlage <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Network problems (From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>)
 >[OT]Re: Network problems (From: Jurvis LaSalle <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT]Re: Network problems (From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.