Tim Goeke wrote:
>There's another compelling issue that makes Java more relevant than
>ever, and that's BD-J.
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BD-J)
According to that article:
"... BD-J is based on Java version 1.3."
Therefore, you should already be able to compile for the BD-J target
platform using either Java 5 or JDK 1.4 with the -target and -source
options set to "1.3".
However, according to this:
<http://www.blueboard.com/bluray/bluray_guides.htm>
BD-J is a variant of J2ME/JME, which is a completely different animal from
J2SE/JSE. It also makes the Wikipedia article wrong.
A delayed Java 6 may indeed be a development obstacle, just not for BD-J.
-- GG
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
