[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: compiling ant to a native binary

Subject: Re: compiling ant to a native binary
From: "Ray O'Leary" <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:16:27 -0500

This is interesting. I worked on a large J2EE project (thousands of classes, hundreds of thousands of lines of code) for two years until Feb. 2002, using jikes to compile and Jikes never hit any "bad" byte code.

On Wednesday, Aug 27, 2003, at 18:15 America/Chicago, Joseph Dane wrote:

Rob Lockstone <email@hidden> writes:

Fwiw, I've read on several occasions that the byte code generated by
jikes isn't always reliable. I don't know why or under what
circumstances it produces "bad" code, but for that reason alone, I
won't use jikes and would caution others to be careful.

I'll throw in a "me too", although it's been at least a year since I
last tried jikes.
<snip>

_______________________________________________
java-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
Be sure to read the FAQ http://developer.apple.com/java/faq/ before posting
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compiling ant to a native binary
  - From: Andrew Thompson <email@hidden>

Prev by Date: Re: is it only a performace problem?
Next by Date: Re: compiling ant to a native binary
Previous by thread: Re: compiling ant to a native binary
Next by thread: Re: compiling ant to a native binary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home