Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Java VM specifics on MacOSX

Well for me these optimisations really work. On an Intel/Windows platform:
Sun's server VM for Windows gives me 2-3 times the performance of the client
VM (and the warmup period only seems to extend by a few seconds).

Also, isn't WebObjects now Java based? As a server product written by Apple,
I thought this would benefit as well...

Andy.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Hall" <email@hidden>
To: "John W. Whitworth" <email@hidden>
Cc: "Java-Dev" <email@hidden>; "Andrew Larder"
<email@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Java VM specifics on MacOSX


>
> On Saturday, April 24, 2004, at 07:43 AM, John W. Whitworth wrote:
> >
>
> > without a server JVM with aggressive JIT compilation, inlining,
> > optimisation etc. which is very disappointing.
>
> Isn't it true that at least some of the optimizations that have been
> added into the server JVM are hardware dependent? Sun type hardware
> specifically. I think the software type optimizations involved would
> favor longer running tasks where the server runs for hours or days. I
> still don't think these types of optimizations would buy you much for
> computationally intense code.
>
> > Mike Hall <mikehall at spacestar dot net>
> <http://www.spacestar.net/users/mikehall>
_______________________________________________
java-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Java VM specifics on MacOSX (From: Michael Hall <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.