| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
email@hidden wrote:
Todd O'Bryan wrote:I disagree with this assertion, if it is meant to imply that Apple coudnt write a 1.5 version for older mac OSs, at least 10... the low-level OS abstraction layers can almost ALWAYS be implemented even on old platforms, or at least emulated (except for some overly complex native window stuff). If one doesnt "believe" this statement, witness how Suns newest JVMs operate even on the other OS's that are 8 years old (albeit with handicapped Swing). Sun provides the missing, "machinery" as native or bytecode if the native OS doesnt provide it.
| So, it seems that most of what Sun provides is just Java code for | various added APIs with new releases of software.
| | ...
|
| Or is there more going on here than I think?
Much more. Many of the library classes call native methods to do the heavy lifting; every one of those methods has to be implemented and debugged anew for each platform. (For example, the "concurrency" classes require the implementation of the machinery which allows lock-free access to variables shared across threads.)
Glen Fisher
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >What in 1.5 is non-Java? (From: "Todd O'Bryan" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: What in 1.5 is non-Java? (From: email@hidden) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.