| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Oct 28, 2004, at 5:00 PM, Rolf Howarth wrote:
At 12:04 pm -0700 25/10/04, Scott Palmer <email@hidden> wrote:
On Oct 24, 2004, at 9:43 PM, Dmitry Markman wrote:
I'm always wondering why people want to obfuscate their code it's mystery to me :-((
They erroneously think it protects their code. (hint: Copyright laws protect your code. Obfuscation just adds a step to your build process and makes stack traces less useful.)
Consider that most software that is "cracked" and pirated is compiled to machine code. Nobody needs to see your source code to steal from you.
If the bad guys want it, they will take it. You will still have to catch them and sue them to stop them.
Well, let's take the argument to the opposite extreme. If obfuscated code is no more protected than code with all the symbols in, what about the other way round? Presumably publishing the complete source code with comments and all is no less protected in that case? Might as well include all the project files, raw resource files and ant scripts as well. And why not the complete cvs source repository, bug database and design documents as well for good measure??
Scott
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Re: code mangler (From: Rolf Howarth <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.