I'm not sure about "Mapped Byte Buffers"
(as I understand it works with mapped File)
but RMI I think implemented on top of the Sockets
so I don't think that RMI will be faster
On Oct 29, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Brad BARCLAY wrote:
On Oct 29, 2004, at 10:19, Michael Purdy wrote:
I will be needing to implement a method to allow two java applications
to communicate and transfer data. It will need to operate at the
fastest possible rate. My plan thus far is to establish a socket
connection between the two and create a sort of client-server system.
Does anyone have opinions on this strategy or suggestions for
alternate,
possibly faster, methods.
This is exactly the sort of problem RMI was designed to solve. And
RMI is built right into Java.
Brad BARCLAY
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From the Mac OS X Desktop of Brad BARCLAY
E-Mail: email@hidden Web:
http://www.jsyncmanager.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
Dmitry Markman
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
