"Eric Kolotyluk" <email@hidden> wrote:
>Myself,
>I'm tempted to live on the edge, forgoing the compile time safety of
>generics, and live with run-time errors just to make the code more
>readable.
When I'm unwilling to forgo static type-safety, I create type-specific
classes that do exactly what I want, neither more nor less. The result is
almost always much simpler than implementing an all-singing all-dancing
interface like Collection or Set. And it works for Java versions before
1.5/5.0, too.
-- GG
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
