| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 8/30/06, bsd5tu1 <email@hidden> wrote:How many out there really adhere to the class naming convention (example com.mycompany.myproduct.XXX.java) for actual products? Why or why not?
At work we use it extensively. It's important when you start working with multiple third-party libraries. And with a decent IDE, the directory structure is not an issue, and the package structure can be a benefit.
The package structure also helps you to minimize the "surface area" of the API of your app, through the use of package-private classes and methods.
If you looking in any of my projects, you would not just see com.myname.project.XXX.java but com.myname.project.packagea.packageb. ... .xxx.java
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Class naming convention (From: bsd5tu1 <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Class naming convention (From: "Rick Genter" <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.