[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java

Subject: Re: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
From: "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:27:09 -0700
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=npbfJovyld03bdb3FAbCgyUIPogwzhZWyScLf50BwPpMSOokm+GU680sHVEg+cri1d/z0slVThzu+XEjlOuyH5aR3nhDqv8n5zkflpQjD1aP19tWMSFR+uVckLOSLzmkmV1QEqyI4KZMjxnuwrvnUwW20x/+H0qQHyJmY6MAikU=

On 8/16/06, Ian Joyner <email@hidden> wrote:

being C and preprocessor based


Apple's Objective-C/C++ isn't preprocessor based, it is natively
compiled by gcc and has a robust runtime.

-Shawn
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
  - From: Elliotte Harold <email@hidden>
- Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
  - From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>

References:
	>Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Vince Marco <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
Next by Date: Re: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
Previous by thread: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
Next by thread: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home