Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java




On Aug 17, 2006, at 16:28 , Shawn Erickson wrote:


On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:59 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:

This thread convinced me to start reading about Objective-C. More soon, but the short version is GACK! This is not a modern language. Leaving library issues and VM aside, Java is a vastly superior language. Apple would have done themselves and their developers a big favor if they had based Cocoa on Java or C#-like knockoff rather than Objective-C.

You really should use Objective-C in the real world for a while before making such judgments. Objective-C is purposely a loose language based on engineers establishing and following programming patterns instead of the language enforcing such patterns itself.


Java and Objective-C are different languages in fundamental ways (however with a lot of similarities) so black and white comparisons such as what you state above is unfair to the strengths of each language.


Even if I'm pretty much on the same idea of Elliotte, the point is that comparing languages on the "I like/I dislike" basis is an approach that leads nowhere - or to a flame war :-)


I have a more objective argument against Objective-C (no pun intended): Java (or C++) are in the top ten languages used in the world, Objective-C is way below in the list. The point of using a language is not only related to the learning curve, but to the company procedures and in the end to the ROI - if my company is not focused exclusively on Mac OS X I find that learning a niche language such Objective-C, be it good or bad, is a waste of time/money. The choice of not supporting other languages, such as Java, makes it harder to write first-class applications for Mac OS X if you need some tight integration with the operating system.

The choice of a niche language is consistent with other "niche" choices by Apple, but I think that these choices have a negative impact on the success of Apple computers, which are by far the best in the world both for hardware and operating system - I mean, if Apple had 10% of the market instead of 3-4% we all would be happier, isn't it?

--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://www.tidalwave.it/blog - email@hidden
mobile: +39 348.150.6941 - fax: +39 027.005.105.36


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Vince Marco <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Elliotte Harold <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.