Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java



But there was a great deal of legacy code. Mac OS X was built on the NeXT Foundation and AppKit frameworks which were all Objective C.

On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:31 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:

But it's not 1987. It's 20 years later. Given the lack of legacy code in Objective C and the few programmers who know it, wouldn't it have made sense for Apple to choose a more modern language for their platform? One that had learned from the mistakes of C, C++, and Objective C?


--
__ Jerry W. Walker,
WebObjects Developer/Instructor for High Performance Industrial Strength Internet Enabled Systems


    email@hidden
    203 278-4085        office



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Vince Marco <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Elliotte Harold <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Rob Ross <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java (From: Elliotte Harold <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.