Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Apple should get behind Cocoa Java



Alan Snyder wrote:

As a result, adding a new method to an interface will require clients to change their code, even if they're not interested in actually using the new method. Cocoa delegate clients couldn't care less and won't *have* to change.

Or you can just define a new subinterface, as in LayoutManager and LayoutManager2.

Yes, of course, but that's a big kludge, no?

Ian Joyner wrote:

Delegation is distinct from interfaces & far more powerful. It is part of the runtime as you mentioned, but Cocoa==Obj-C like JavaVM==Java. Java actually took the concept of interfaces from Objective-C where they are called protocols.

I never said that delegation and interfaces are the same thing. I said that delegation can be implemented using interfaces.

IMHO, Interfaces are a poor way to implement delegation; once fixed they cannot be easily extended without breaking client code.

Well interfaces are just really the poor man's multiple inheritance, although the argument for interfaces and against MI is claimed to be theoretical. Thing is that, like Karl says, if you want to add something to the interface then every implementing class has to be changed. In practice, it would be much easier, to add to a real class a default method, so that implementing classes would not be affected.

Adding default methods to a real class is precisely what the Adapter pattern does but then it forces implementers to subclass the Adapter and you lose the freedom to choose the implementer's superclass.



I'm now convinced that there are real advantages to Obj-C's protocols as compared to Java's interfaces. Because I'm new to Obj-C and never gave much detailed thinking to the differences between protocols and interfaces, I was under the impression that everything you could do with protocols (in particular, implement Cocoa's delegation mechanism) could be *easily* done with interfaces.


I've now revised my position. Sure, it's possible to implement the delegation mechanism using interfaces, but there is at least one situation which is much more easily handled by Obj-C's protocols than by Java's interfaces, namely, an after-the-fact addition of a new method to the delegation protocol. While Java implementations struggle with kludges or with forcing clients to change their code, the Obj-C implementation couldn't be any smoother.

Wagner
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden


Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.