On Jul 20, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Paul Cunningham wrote:
I expect that this approach terrifies a lot of people. A lot of
developers get upset about "too many moving parts". But this is
the nature of dynamic applications and this kind of thing happens
to you all the time in the Real World. I say go with the flow and
embrace programming techniques that support this style of
programming.
I'm afraid we're in danger of taking this UML thread off-topic to
java.
Java-as-language, but not Java-as-platform. There are a lot of new
languages that can be compiled into Java bytecode and some of them
are dynamic (I'm not following much that thread, but I'm sure of that).
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
