My reason for anger is the lack of support for Intel32 bits and PPC.
For the thing of -server only, it's not necessarily a bad thing. With
Linux and Windows I've some hints that suggest that -server is the
best thing even for my desktop application, since it's computationally
intensive. I've not tested yet which is the price to pay for any
eventual delay in booting, I need more profiling, but the point is
that I'd suggest to people developing for the desktop to have a try
before worrying.
On Apr 30, 2008, at 4:42 , Scott Palmer wrote:
It appears that only the server VM is included. Odd, given that so
much of the new stuff in Java 6 are features for producing better
desktop applications.
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_05"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_05-b13-120)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_05-b13-52, mixed mode)
$ java -client -version
java version "1.6.0_05"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_05-b13-120)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_05-b13-52, mixed mode)
Scott
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden
