Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Soft-RAID and Hard-RAID?



At 20:27 -0400 04/29/2002, John C. Welch wrote:
On 04/29/2002 17:16, "Kok-Yong Tan" <email@hidden> wrote:

While a RAID 5 config may function perfectly well with one drive
missing, what do you think will happen if you do so and another drive
fails before the RAID system is rebuilt? Unlikely, you say? Well,
it happened to me and, boy, will I not do it again!!! Now, I always
work on the worst case scenario, especially when handling data and
leave the "cowboying" to other people. Perhaps you've had bad
experiences with badly implemented RAID 1 solutions but the systems I
manage have complete failover where someone can yank a RAID-1 drive
out and it will failover instantly to the mirrored volume with nary a
hiccup. Of course, all our arguments are moot because they aren't
available to MacOS X Server. Oh well. Let's leave it at that.

The rebuild time depends on the implementation of the RAID. I've run 600GB
to TB+ raids, and the rebuild time for any one drive was measured in
seconds. More expensive? Sure, but if you need reliability, that's a price
worth paying. As well, what makes RAID 1 invulnerable to multiple drive
failures? You lose both dives of a mirror, and you're just as dead. RAID is
not a substitute for a good backup plan.

That's important, so let's make it more clear:

RAID IS NOT A SUBSTITUE FOR A GOOD BACKUP PLAN

It gives you more reliability, and allows you to have redundancy. But any
RAID can fail. I've seen systems with monster caches have one active, and
two hot spares die...all from a bad lot.

I agree with ALL your points. I was just trying to show that RAID-5 is no better off than RAID-1. Everything is a tradeoff.


But to say that RAID 5 is more or less reliable than RAID 1 is simply
incorrect in the extreme. They are different ways to get the same thing
done. Both are fine in the even of a single drive loss. Both are uite dead
if multiple drives are lost before you can rebuild.

Uh...I didn't say that RAID-5 was better than RAID-1 or vice versa. Jon L. Gardner was the person who said that and I was just quoting him in my reply.
--
Reality Artisans, Inc.
P.O. Box 565, Gracie Station
New York, NY 10028-0019
http://www.realityartisans.com
"We craft ideas into reality"
_______________________________________________
macos-x-server mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macos-x-server
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
References: 
 >Re: Soft-RAID and Hard-RAID? (From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.