Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NAT IPFW problem



At 9:39 AM +0100 11/30/05, Cornelius Jaeger wrote:
hi dan,

But your tunneling through it. Makes the whole concept moot.

no i'm not. i have two (2) lines to the internet. one for the dmz, the other for the lan. the lan gateway is not in the dmz. i hope you can open pdf's and that the diagram clarifies.

The diagram seems suspect. Some points Ken points out in his message.

Another biggie is how the WAN side of this diagram is configured, and very importantly is the WAN side the same network (i.e. subnet)??

We'll also make some presumptions, unless you clarify:

The "DMZ Firewall" is your 3Com router with a DMZ segment. (It would of course really be helpful to know what model this is as many "DMZ" thingies in such devices really aren't and are only just a sink for all traffic not mapped.)

Your DMZ hosts have static, public IP addresses.


First a couple of "understandings" need calcified:

A "Cable Modem" is always "stupid" in the sense that it doesn't do DHCP or NAT. If it did it would be a different device, or a more complete device. But a modem does just what it implies.

A DMZ is designed to be quartered off from your LAN, that is it's a whole separate network segment. Traffic should only be permitted between the outside world and these hosts ONLY.

Packets destined for your DMZ hosts, which you state have static, public IP addresses, will get routed through the magic of the Internet from that warm fuzzy cloud to the 3Com router b/c they're not the IP address being served by the cable modem, hence you should have no packets destined for those hosts ever appearing to the XServe in that picture acting as your LAN gateway.

If traffic destined to DMZ hosts on your LAN at all, you have invalidated the whole reason for having a DMZ, namely that you're keeping traffic separate on the two discrete networks.



Now, what is it you think you're trying to do again???

If you're trying to say that packets "coming in" to the XServe from the Internet should be revectored through the LAN to the DMZ segment you have a very serious breach of your DMZ.
--


-dhan

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Shoop                                                   AIM: iWiring
Systems & Networks Architect                     http://www.iwiring.net/
email@hidden                                 http://www.ustsvs.com/

pgp key fingerprint: FAC0 9434 B5A5 24A8 D0AF  12B1 7840 3BE7 3736 DE0B

iWiring provides systems and networks support for Mac OS X, unix, and
Open Source application technologies at affordable rates.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >NAT IPFW problem (From: Cornelius Jaeger <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NAT IPFW problem (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NAT IPFW problem (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NAT IPFW problem (From: Cornelius Jaeger <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NAT IPFW problem (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.