On 2007-02-28 Dan Shoop wrote:
> At 5:58 PM +0100 2/28/07, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2007-02-28 Dan Shoop wrote:
>>> Moreover if you dont' own your IP addresses then you shouldn't be
>>> host DNS for public consumption either so there's no problem here.
>>
>> Dan, please do a reality-check. Now. This is done all the time in the
>> real world, and it works quite well. I DO NOT need to be
>> authoritative for 217.10.9.0/26 (or even 217.10.9.49) to be
>> authoritative for planetcobalt.net.
>>
>> If the authoritative DNS for a given address range provides correct
>> PTR records there is no (in words "no") valid reason to do it over
>> again. Period.
>
> Then you have owership and control of your IP addresses which is a
> different matter altogether.
>
> What you're problem with understanding hlow to spilt horizons in each
> of these cases is and why you think you can't do this with with OS X
> Server as it ships is beyond me.
I don't know what gave you the idea I wouldn't understand how split
horizon works. I do. And I am very well aware of the fact that split
horizon does solve the problem. However, for some reason you obviously
fail to understand that it solves a problem that SHOULD NOT EXIST in the
first place.
I'll rephrase my question: why can't OS X use a perfectly working DNS
where the PTR records are provided by some other nameserver?
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files,
erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files."
--http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
