Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Running Webserver (public) and Fileserver (private) on same server?



I don't have an Xserver (yet...about to get one).  But in theory, you should be able to do it.  It's a matter of firewalling some things.  Is your Xserver also your firewall?  Do you have two separate networking card on you Xserver?

Personal opinion:
-------
Ed Pastore is right.  It doesn't take much of a box to shell out pages and graphics.  I would get a cheap box (I would never recommend Dell on an Apple forum, that wouldn't be smart...but...) and throw Linux on it.

If you are desperate to use a Mac for web services (I'm sure Apple doesn't want to see this post) but you can use a Mac Mini.  Apache and PHP is installed by default and it is VERY easy to setup PostgreSQL/MySQL.
-------

aaron

On 5/31/07, Ed Pastore <email@hidden> wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Mike Purdy wrote:

> I have a client who would like to host a website via apache to public
> visitors, as well as have the same server run afp, windows
> services, and
> act as a PDC for Windows users.  It is a small shop...probably 10
> users.
>  I don't doubt that a new MacPro could handle the load, but I
> wonder of
> the prudence of allowing public connections to the webserver on a box
> that hosts private network services also.  Not knowing the details of
> how these different services are sandboxed, I figured I would pose the
> question here.  Is there any reason to be concerned about this, or
> would
> they coexist fine?

I have run medium-volume web servers (~3k visitors per day on lots of
different pages and graphics) where every page was server-parsed
(shtml with three include files) and every page also ran two or more
perlscripts... This ran on a 100 MHz 486 linux box, and the server
was never other than lightning-fast. Apache is amazingly efficient,
as are most other linux web server technologies.

I know this isn't the question you asked, but still... is it possible
they could consider setting up a very cheap apache box? I'll bet it
could be done for less than $100, if you don't mind slightly-used
technology.

As for the question you did ask, I think the party line is that
technically it is supposed to be OK, but healthy paranoia would
suggest otherwise. It also somewhat depends on the setup. If, for
example, they're going to ftp files up to the web server from remote
locations, then I would be very leery indeed.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list      (email@hidden )
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.