No, I said they were using iCal. I specifically used that word and
not CalDAV and said it was production ready.
You did not use the word iCal :
This is incorrect and misleading. Apple's new iCal Server uses the
CalDAV standard, which "everyone" in the industry (except
Microsoft) is trying to work out implementations of right now.
CalDAV is somewhat based on iCal, which is industry standard (even
Microsoft uses it to sent invitations back and forth), but CalDAV
is still a new/emerging technology. Apple seems to be a leader in
this area, but the "big boys" such as Lotus Notes seem to be very
interested in this standard as well.
I'm not sure where you're getting your information but those "big
boys" are currently implementing this as a standard.
You did not refer to iCal, and did not use this word. The whole
paragraph was about CalDAV, not iCalendar.
But there is no way you could call CalDAV or iCal Server
"production ready" before MacOS X Server.
I'll be sure to point that out the those who've been using it then
in production for some time, and that includes some rather big
enterprises using some very popular and production products. I
suspect IBM is going to disagree with your assessment here...
Again, you responded directly to CalDav and iCal Server. You did not
use the word iCal.
And I agree with others : CalDAV, even if based on WebDAV and
iCalendar specs, is not yet deployed anywhere but in Leopard's iCal
Server. It's a new emerging standard, a new player in the field.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
