Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Beginner Questions




On Oct 17, 2007, at 9:20 AM, david wrote:


On Oct 17, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Jason Pruim wrote:


On Oct 16, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Allyen Wilson wrote:

I have a small company with 2 employees and 4 full-time contractors. I want to start using Leopard server (running on a dedicated G5 Powermac with Airport only network) primarily for file sharing, document library, and internal wiki etc. Not for email, website hosting etc. Will I see any file sharing performance increase using server over the computer to computer sharing I use now? At this point Leopard server is not a critical business tool I just want to keep pushing my knowledge of all things mac. But I also hope that it will at least help things run a little faster and smoother. Any other benefits I could expect?

In addition, is there a book or website that you can recommend for non-IT professionals? My google efforts have not turned up much for novices.



On Oct 16, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Dan Shoop wrote:
That last part smells like a very bad idea. For one OS X Server requires good, real DNS so a WiFi network isolated from any other network is going to be problematic. Services over WiFi also are going to perform poorly. And the latency will cause numerous problems. YMMV but expect it on the "poor" side.


Hi Allyen,

I can't speak for leopard since I don't even have a developer copy, but I do something very similar with tiger server. Except I host AFP, SMB, FTP, iChat, Mail, Web, DNS, Pretty much the gammet of options. and I connect to the server via a wireless connection, my internal airport into a linksys wireless router. I don't have any issues accessing, the server except for 1 program (An accounting program) that apple didn't make is a little slow on some tasks.

For a single user it might be fine, but Dan has already pointed out some of the important cautions about going that route. 

Wireless access should not be considered an equivalent to wired connections, it's dismaying when I see (for example) small companies choose a wireless setup because they believe (falsely) it will be as good or that for some unkown reason, "wireless = better" . 

I didn't mean to imply that wireless was necessarily better... Just that depending on what kind of load you put on your server it is at least an alternative... I'm running a 1.4 Ghz G4 with 1 gig of ram for my server and it's able to keep up just fine with what I need to do with it.

But to clarify, wireless is slower then wired. Always has been always will be(?) but depending on what you are transferring over the wireless network, it could be an alternative.

For me, the decision to make my work station wireless was the fact that I needed to add a computer to the work force that needed a network connection but didn't have wireless built in. Didn't have to run any additional wires to make it work. 

--

Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
3251 132nd ave
Holland, MI, 49424
www.raoset.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Beginner Questions (From: Allyen Wilson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Beginner Questions (From: Jason Pruim <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Beginner Questions (From: david <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.