On 2008-05-07 Dave Schroeder wrote:
> Because the license explicitly allows OS X to only be run on Apple-
> labeled hardware.
>
> Whether the EULA is ultimately enforceable under the laws of various
> jurisdictions is irrelevant to the point that it violates the license
> agreement.
Contrary to your beliefs that isn't true at all. Since under certain
jurisdictions (e.g. Germany) the EULA does not become effective there
simply isn't an agreement that could be violated in the first place.
Note that "the EULA does not become effective" doesn't mean that all
terms listed in it would be null and void. Those parts that are covered
by national laws are still effective. However, that's not because
they're in the EULA, but because they're in the law.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files,
erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files."
--http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
