Am 14.07.2011 um 14:32 schrieb Kelvin Chung:
>>> std::array<id, 3> threeIDs = {@"foo", @"bar", @"baz"};
>>
>> Why would you have a C++ array of ObjC objects in the first array?
>
> Because when I work with Obj-C++, I typically have to deal with incredibly awkward mixes of C++ objects and Objective-C objects.
I don't see why you would have those mixes, they won't work anyway. If you put ObjC objects in C++ classes like you did above, you break the reference counting anyway.
>> It's quite simple: If you want to store C++ "objects", use C++ classes. If you want to store ObjC objects, use ObjC classes.
>
> If I had to do that, then I'd pick one language over the other. Objective-C++ has both, so I can use the benefits of both.
You had to pick one language over the other just because you use C++ classes to store C++ objects and ObjC classes to store ObjC objects? That sounds strange. You would not use an array in ObjC and create a class for boxing to store C++ objects either, so why do it the other way around?
It seems you misunderstood what ObjC++ is. ObjC++ is two separate langauges in the same file, ObjC and C++. They can't be mixed, because they are incompatible.
--
Jonathan
Attachment:
PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Objc-language mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
