Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
Re: SSE3.5, SSE4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SSE3.5, SSE4




On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Ben Weiss wrote:


On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:39 AM, Ian Ollmann wrote:

Since this is the first time that you've all had to support an optional vector ISA extension (for real) on the platform

Can SSSE3 (and SSE3) be assumed when compiling 64-bit code, or do we really need to handle the 64-bit, SSE2-only case?

I am not aware of any announcement from Apple on this subject. You might contact DTS. There are x86_64 CPUs in production that do not support SSSE3 out there, so it's best to be conservative. I'm not aware of any that don't support SSE3 that do support x86_64.


As a practical matter, if you are going to the trouble to separate out code for 32-bit, it seems like the natural thing to me to separate it out for 64-bit too.

Ian
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
PerfOptimization-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Meaning of letters in simg5 output (From: Jonathan Taylor <email@hidden>)
 >SSE3.5, SSE4 (From: Holger Bettag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SSE3.5, SSE4 (From: Shaun Wexler <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SSE3.5, SSE4 (From: Ian Ollmann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SSE3.5, SSE4 (From: Ian Ollmann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SSE3.5, SSE4 (From: Ben Weiss <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.