[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cache or draw direct?

Subject: Re: cache or draw direct?
From: Scott Thompson <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:16:44 -0500
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden

I would advise trying to draw the graphics with Quartz first, and only jump to Quartz 2D if performance proves to be unacceptable.

Er rather... I would say try drawing the graphics directly using Quartz 2D calls and then move to a caching scheme only if performance is unacceptable and the caching scheme proves to be beneficial.

Sorry about the bad sentence :-)

Scott
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartz-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartz-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cache or draw direct?
  - From: "Steve Mills" <email@hidden>

References:
	>cache or draw direct? (From: "Steve Mills" <email@hidden>)
	>Re: cache or draw direct? (From: Robert Curtis <email@hidden>)
	>Re: cache or draw direct? (From: Scott Thompson <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: 16 bit integer per colour bitmap graphics context
Next by Date: Re: User Spaces vs. Generic Spaces
Previous by thread: Re: cache or draw direct?
Next by thread: Re: cache or draw direct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home