On 27/09/2005, at 2:22 AM, Pierre-Olivier Latour wrote:
My goal is for "A", "B", C" to be rendered at X=0, X=0.3 and X=0.6
respectively. However what happens is that "C", "C", "C" is
rendered albeit at the correct locations.
That's actually a bug in Render in Image we are aware of, and I
don't think there's anything you can do to work around it.
OK, so how about if I create many QCRenderer instances with the same
qtz file instead of looping within qtz. I suspect that looping in qtz
may be more efficient, but if creating many QCRenderers isn't a big
issue, I'm happy with that approach. In fact, creating many
QCRenderers makes life a little easier for me.
In summary, if I create 200 QCRenderer instances for the same qtz
file then are things going to be terribly inefficient?
Cheers,
-C
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden
