The following JavaScript code takes as input
a slider value in the range 0.0 to 1.0
an image height (in pixels)
and the image's aspect ratio
It is meant to output a whole number to the CellHeight
output
and that number multiplied by the aspect ratio at the
CellWidth output.
Instead, what I get is the correct value at the Width
output, but the CellHeight output always shows a zero.
This is actually the same issue I was having with the
code in my previous post.
Can someone tell me if this is a JavaScript patch bug,
or if I'm missing something obvious?
It seems that it is possible to define multiple named
inputs of the same type, but can someone confirm
whether or not it is possible to define multiple named
outputs in the same way?
If not, why not, I wonder? It would seem to be a
desirable thing to do..
Cheers,
alx
http://www.toneburst.net
/* JAVASCRIPT PATCH CODE */
// Define function, inputs and outputs
function
(__number CellWidth,
__number CellHeight
) main (
__number CellSizeSlider,
__number Height,
__number AspectRatio
)
{
// Initialise output object
var result = new Object();
// Reverse slider value
cellSize = 1.0 - CellSizeSlider;
// Output width as whole-number division of Height
cellHeight = Math.floor(cellSize * Height);
cellWidth = cellHeight * AspectRatio
result.CellWidth = cellWidth;
result.CellHeight = cellHeight;
// Output values
return result;
}
___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
