A more specific question--is all the Java support and overhead
present when i use QC, even
if I have no use for it?
The support is there, probably lazily loaded (so not really, unless
something makes use of it). memory-wise, the same -- likely not
loaded unless something else touches it. Core Image filters do a bit
with javascript, so that may cause it to get loaded etc.
As for CPU overhead, none at all -- QC doesn't appear to have any per-
frame dependance upon JS aside from the JS patch (a good thing ;).
It's loaded via the ExtraPatches.plugin bundle. with CoreImage
filters, I'm not sure whether or not that's evaluated by default (I've
not profiled/inspected that aspect of filtering) -- but if you make a
more elaborate filter function, it's almost certainly evaluated per-
frame. :(
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
