Re: iterator performance

Subject: Re: iterator performance

From: George Toledo <email@hidden>

Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:38:50 -0500

Delivered-to: email@hidden

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=waGCCUw5iYcT1tr+WleRHiAOvMzh3k8SSr65MPS84Zg=; b=ULjUF8SYfbUfBB/lBAKEMkTfdyzb4idKsOVg5heMlAdPQNrImmqaDa/1UjzJ7Wq9YF +xbMvaNVvbZ1zO3OXkZ8bfYbKQShT/W3Ui30gc83+X72CWKgt47FYWrTtlDawrEcwfNR RccFSiMdWm72oqDArBjpFixegAwuqD+5d9pc4=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kSIl2XbgkyFb4I4Fyyoonsz85Di3g5myZ5bEXn03i74Ium0TJ/GmgM+/CtQo2Pa/GG l2sHFPq6f3qeXqR7KWsJ3IzYT15OHr0i2nraNgMLfhx7h1DLmSQqyaB8+rDBQ2vAMSNw OP7mEhS3BQDHWVMUX8esTYtxtnb96iXIiWlLQ=

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Christopher Wright <email@hidden> wrote:

Another test case that yields somewhat different results:

<2000lines.qtz>

Ahh, this is interesting - it's line based (not sprite based), so perhaps it's a function of which consumers/renderers are inside? curiouser and curiouser... :)

Well, if you want to really get miffed, check this out (OpenCL Mesh iteration). I don't even get an fps reading on it, though changing iteration amounts obviously changes the apparent visual speed in the Viewer. Really odd. I can crank this thing up so that things even get a bit non responsive (I don't want to push into a freeze), and I still won't get an fps reading.

-George Toledo

Attachment: Color Ball.qtz
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:

Re: iterator performance
- From: vade <email@hidden>

References:

>iterator performance (From: Christopher Wright <email@hidden>)

>Re: iterator performance (From: Steve Mokris <email@hidden>)

>Re: iterator performance (From: Christopher Wright <email@hidden>)