Re: iterator performance

Subject: Re: iterator performance

From: George Toledo <email@hidden>

Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:50:40 -0500

Delivered-to: email@hidden

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Ig0Q1/yJNHsuotn0NUA08d5cFVMc/e9Zbr/ArL/ZoAE=; b=L4l8DmYzpGOtqd/tPr4ZMvkQEbl7j79kpJhy6zISpK2kjl1+Iv9oerEFlweeNOlSS4 +7LwjLpH2PfPq61HgCJe5+VGxOd58sibYZocH+NVRLzRHUec4eY6Zj4OJCKjBs5ScbVT A+GyJacMF+GVMvevTN4v57PabXsmbGEkbqaQ8=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=MAVDde7WluTOriQaGDYWMtUs59pyc5BAh8FkrE9fDm9yjp5dE6VGGBRfRhb8pUbesa WRYcJZIHlrUt0A4Hjtk9BNZc4/xex7PbH1MD3U6/9DEPVGgIH9a66OHNpkyiJa2uJMQS QeXQjkcSS5z2OkrHLHs2G5SQlNnbZTBHUBELM=

Going back through the other examples with the fps display patch, things are basically consistent whichever I use (the fps patch or the Viewer both reflect similar performance decreases).

-George Toledo

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, vade <email@hidden> wrote:

Ive also noticed the FPS patch can offer very different results compared to what the FPS in the viewer reads. Not sure which to trust, but it seem like the viewer gives me more believable results to my eye.

On Nov 4, 2009, at 5:38 PM, George Toledo wrote:

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Christopher Wright <email@hidden> wrote:

Another test case that yields somewhat different results:

<2000lines.qtz>

Ahh, this is interesting - it's line based (not sprite based), so perhaps it's a function of which consumers/renderers are inside? curiouser and curiouser... :)

Well, if you want to really get miffed, check this out (OpenCL Mesh iteration). I don't even get an fps reading on it, though changing iteration amounts obviously changes the apparent visual speed in the Viewer. Really odd. I can crank this thing up so that things even get a bit non responsive (I don't want to push into a freeze), and I still won't get an fps reading.

-George Toledo

<Color Ball.qtz> _______________________________________________

Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden

References:

>iterator performance (From: Christopher Wright <email@hidden>)

>Re: iterator performance (From: Steve Mokris <email@hidden>)

>Re: iterator performance (From: Christopher Wright <email@hidden>)

>Re: iterator performance (From: George Toledo <email@hidden>)

>Re: iterator performance (From: vade <email@hidden>)