Hi John,
I don't know about the consensus but I suspect you can
do much more with QTJ than you can through the JS
interface. Figuring out how to use it isn't easy, but
what's there really does work and works well.
As far as multimedia in Java goes there really is no
other choice. JMF is what's really dead, and the
consensus on that is pretty consistent.
Good luck.
--Alex
--- John S O'Sullivan
<email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About a year ago I dipped into this list for a
> while. I was considering some
> development with quicktime and spent some time
> evaluating the java option
> with some basic apps from the SDK and some
> monitoring of the list for a
> while. At the time there was a lot of discontent and
> a feeling that QT for
> Java was becoming increasingly difficult to use with
> little support,
> increasing depreciation of features and a lack of
> clarity regarding its
> future. After that period of evaluation I decided to
> struggled on and try to
> get all I could from the javascript interface.
> However, this this now seems
> incapable of meeting my future needs. I was
> wondering what the consensus is
> now. If you had a blank page would you go the QT for
> Java route?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
> ignored.
> QuickTime-java mailing list
> (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-java/email@hidden
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-java mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-java/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
