On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 03:12 PM, Arno Bosse wrote:
Tried that - crashes QT too. Looks like I may be stuck exporting to
animation 100% and then back to something else. Any good candidates
for a very high visual quality, greyscale, low cpu load codec for a
320x240 movie?
I don't get it - for storage/archiving, or for playback? If for
playback, then why not just go back to using JPEG2000 (redo the
original encode in JPEG2000 again).
Also, is this purely a synthetic image? Or is it just a grayscale
organic image?
And how low CPU load do you really need? I'd hardly consider JPEG2000
low-CPU.
Animation will certainly be very high quality and low-load... but why?
You'll get much better compression from JPEG2000, MPEG-4, Sorenson 3,
etc. If it's a synthetic image PNG may work very well for you and will
be lossless.
-R
_______________________________________________
quicktime-talk mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-talk
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
