Alex,
Well, we don't have ANY implementations of the Studio Profiles outside
of reference software to date, so it's hard to predict how it could perform
in optimized commercial implementations.
I'd guess that in intraframe only mode, it'd be faster than JPEG2000,
but slower than MJPEG, and will compress better than MJPEG, but not as well
as JPEG2000. Of course, unlike either of those, MPEG-4 supports interframe
encoding, so it could be a very useful codec for things like archiving and
intermediates, along the line of 15 Mbps IBBP today.
Ben Waggoner <http://www.benwaggoner.com>
Compressed Video Consulting, Training, and Encoding
My Book: <http://www.benwaggoner.com/books.htm>
Cleaner e-book: <http://www.cmpbooks.com/cleaner>
Compression Classes at Stanford June 30-July 4 and Aug 11-15
<http://www.digitalmediaacademy.org/compression.html>
Compression Class in New York City, July 13
<http://www.manhattanvideoworkshop.com/courses.html>
on 6/28/03 3:32 PM, Alex Telitsine at email@hidden wrote:
> Yes, it was interesting. Anyone knows when it will be available and how does
> it stand against MJPEG in speed, and JPEG2000 in compression ratio?
_______________________________________________
quicktime-talk mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-talk
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
