Re: Cleaner or squeeze?

• Subject: Re: Cleaner or squeeze?
• From: David Egbert <email@hidden>
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 23:42:31 -0600
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309

I think Squeeze will give you the best bang for the buck.... unless you
need:

Dynamic Preview
Audio Noise Reduction
Audio Equalization
Metadata Added to Movies at the time of compression
Hue/Saturation
To compress from in/out points.
Alternate Movies at the time of compression
Etc.


--
Dave Egbert



On 5/29/03 1:21 PM, "Alain Boisvert" <email@hidden> wrote:

> I don't want to start a debate. Since I am on a limited budget. If I
> can only get one of these software (Cleaner / Squeeze).
> Which should it be?
> I plan to use this mostly to help me get great quality versus size (but
> quality is the most important).
> I won't use this  to prepare QT for the web.
> 
> --------------------
> Alain Boisvert
> 
> Directeur artistique Le Matou Noir
> www.lematounoir.qc.ca
> _______________________________________________
> quicktime-talk mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-talk
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
quicktime-talk mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-talk
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Cleaner or squeeze?
    • From: Ben Waggoner <email@hidden>
  • Re: Cleaner or squeeze?
    • From: "Kuniyoshi Murata" <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: White Frames at End of Saved Movies
• Next by Date: Current nag-screen situation in current Win-QT?
• Previous by thread: Re: Cleaner or squeeze?
• Next by thread: Re: Cleaner or squeeze?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread