Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
Re: offsetting flash track'
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: offsetting flash track'



if you have access to both Panther and Jaguar, please have a look at:
http://www.media.uio.no/personer/gunnarl/testintro/

What is going on???


Your layer numbers in this version are very strange. Also there's new track in there, and tracks renamed, so it makes it harder to guess what is the new cause of the problem.

Going back to the performance issue for a moment, I just did a test where I had Activity Monitor open, and watched what QuickTime Player was using. With noting open it uses between 0 and 1.5%. With one of your movies open it uses between 50 and 75%. I tried deleting each of the tracks, and I found that if there is only the track Menu (which I'm assuming was the Flash track), the movie will take between 30 and 60% of my 800 MHz G4's processor time. That's even if the movie is paused and not showing text. Two of your movies playing at once take about 90% of the processor time.

It's hard to tell what is so tough about the Flash track, but it does seem to be quite demanding, even if you believe it to be stopped().
_______________________________________________
quicktime-talk mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-talk
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >offsetting flash track' (From: Hans Magnus <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.