Re: offsetting flash track'

Subject: Re: offsetting flash track'
From: Colin Holgate <email@hidden>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:52:44 -0500

if you have access to both Panther and Jaguar, please have a look at:
http://www.media.uio.no/personer/gunnarl/testintro/

What is going on???

Your layer numbers in this version are very strange. Also there's new track in there, and tracks renamed, so it makes it harder to guess what is the new cause of the problem.

Going back to the performance issue for a moment, I just did a test where I had Activity Monitor open, and watched what QuickTime Player was using. With noting open it uses between 0 and 1.5%. With one of your movies open it uses between 50 and 75%. I tried deleting each of the tracks, and I found that if there is only the track Menu (which I'm assuming was the Flash track), the movie will take between 30 and 60% of my 800 MHz G4's processor time. That's even if the movie is paused and not showing text. Two of your movies playing at once take about 90% of the processor time.

It's hard to tell what is so tough about the Flash track, but it does seem to be quite demanding, even if you believe it to be stopped(). _______________________________________________ quicktime-talk mailing list | email@hidden Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-talk Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: offsetting flash track'
  - From: Hans Magnus <email@hidden>

References:
	>offsetting flash track' (From: Hans Magnus <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: offsetting flash track'
Next by Date: Add to 'offsetting flash track'
Previous by thread: offsetting flash track'
Next by thread: Re: offsetting flash track'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home