As Ben Waggoner mentioned earlier on his
post "If you want an interoperable
video
codec that supports
fields, Motion JPEG B is your best choice. Quality is
excellent
at 90+. It'll
actually be better than None, since it won't force an unneeded RGB
transform"
All the videos are DVC-PRO interlaced . .
. isn't it important to maintain this for final
delivery
to T.V. DVD disk?
I don't think Ben was saying that animation would get rid of a
field, I believe he didn't mention it either because he was just
thinking about video codecs, or he was concerned about the rgb
conversion.
Is it really true that some form of JPEG compression is a better
option than a perfect rgb conversion? Doesn't 24 bit color have enough
information in it to reproduce 4:4:4?
When it is said that PhotoJPEG is lossless, does that mean in
terms of quality, rather than the fact that the original image is
reproduced pixel perfect (as is the case with animation)?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
