[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sorenson 3 Versus H.264

Subject: Re: Sorenson 3 Versus H.264
From: harry <email@hidden>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:12:55 -0400
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden

email@hidden wrote:

Please watch the Sorenson video again, after first making sure your glasses are *on*.

Maybe J's right. Now where's my glasses. Let's see - got them on - yup Sorenson still fuzzy compared to QT7/h.264 ;)

- Harry Pasternak

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>Re: Sorenson 3 Versus H.264 (From: email@hidden)

Prev by Date: Re: Displaying a "sound object" on a web site
Next by Date: Safari QT pro plug-in
Previous by thread: Re: Sorenson 3 Versus H.264
Next by thread: Naming Songs on a Playlist using QuickTime Broadcaster
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home