User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
James Neiss wrote:
Ok after putzing around with VR and my tourism web site, I finally got
my first PRO VR job.... Please check it out and send me your feedback.
If I'm going to be self critical, I could have done a better job with
the large lights....
Ok, I'm sitting down... give me your best shots....
-= Photography=-
360: Virtual Reality Word Wide Web Editorial Commercial Portrait
Wedding http://users.adelphia.net/~jneiss
_______________________________________________
quicktime-vr mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-vr
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Nice stuff. The Java panos appear a little better than the quicktime
versions (IMO). Could be because of different zooms, or perhaps because
PTViewer uses a different gamma than QT?
It's just that when I look at the 2 versions, the QT seems a little
washed out relative to the Java. I think this may be a difference in the
way the 2 viewers would display the same pano image. I Never really
understood the reason for that.
Small defects in the ceiling tiles.
Overall, the panos portray the mood of the restaurant... :-)
Eric
_______________________________________________
quicktime-vr mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-vr
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
