User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
Peter Gotlib wrote:
> none of them "feel" right to me when navigating a pano.
I would be interested on your comments about a flash player.
<http://www.photopla.net/060826boston/>
select Flash from the drop down.
for comparison, you can select other technologies too.
> http://www.osflash.org/papervision3d
>
> The VR sample is the second thumbnail.
now that's what I call something that does not "feel" right when
navigating. But maybe it is because I am used to
QuickTime/SPi-V/ptviewer/PurePlayer/DevalVR all going by the same
navigation. Somebody recently posted on PanotoolsNG a link to a
Microsoft panoviewer. It was quite counter intuitive to me, but maybe
people who don't have the history of looking at so many panos with the
above list of plugins feel differently?
> Also of note is an Object Player - I know someone was previously asking
> about a more "fluid" object viewer.
that was me on PanotoolsNG, asking if it is possible to make Pano2QTVR
objects more fluid.
> This sample sure is fluid -to the point where is spins wildly without
> stopping!
it seems generated 3D with textures (as opposed to a sequence of image)
to me. Plenty of fluid generated 3D solutions out there, in Java among
others. For photographed objectVR, QuickTime still is the most fluid
solution I have seen.
Yuv
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-VR mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-vr/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
