Rich Cook wrote:
> >/usr/local/lib is only marginally different to /sw/lib. If either is
> >in the default ld/dyld search paths or I use -L/usr/local/lib in a
> >link command, I am immediately condemned to link all the Fink/whatever
> >stuff that has been installed, whether I want it or not. That is what
> >I mean by pollution. Obviously the same applies to headers at compile
> >time.
>
> You are just incorrect here. -L/usr/local/lib does not link *ANYTHING*
> in, it simply adds /usr/local/lib to the search paths for libs you
> explicitly request with -lname.
I think that's what he means, Rich.
If you ever once add -L/usr/local/lib to a link line, then all successive
-lname libraries come from /usr/local/lib (assuming they're there), rather
than from the default Apple-provided location. That's pollution, from a
certain point of view.
> Trolling alert! You are Hitler! :-)
Godwin alert! You lose! :-)
-Sean
__
email@hidden
925-422-1648
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/scitech
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
