How about declaring the protocol to conform to NSObject
@protocol MyProto <NSObject>
Does that fix it?
-DT
On Mar 27, 2005, at 8:24 PM, Valia Vaneeva wrote:
On Mar 28, 2005, at 03:54, Dan Treiman wrote:
Did you mean:
id < MyProto> anObject;
anObject
A= [[MyProtoConformingClass alloc] init];
[anObject release]; // release is not defined in MyProto
Sorry, it was a typo :( In the second and third lines of my snippet
"id" must be replaced with "anObject".
id is a shorthand for the variable type (void *); anObject is the
name of the object declared.
However, it looks to me like thats just a typo.
Also, make sure that MyProtoConformingClass inherits from NSObject
(or a subclass of NSObject), because thats where release,
autorelease, retain are implemented.
Yes, it does inherit from NSObject. But the warning remains.
--
A
„r„p„|„‘
How about declaring
Athe protocol conform to NSObject
@protocol MyProto <NSObject>
ADoes that fix it?
A
A
A -DT
On Mar 27, 2005, at 8:24 PM, Valia Vaneeva wrote:
On Mar 28, 2005, at 03:54, Dan Treiman wrote:
Did you mean:
id < MyProto> anObject;
anObject
A= [[MyProtoConformingClass alloc] init];
[anObject release]; // release is not defined in MyProto
Sorry, it was a typo :( In the second and third lines of my snippet
"id" must be replaced with "anObject".
id is a shorthand for the variable type (void *); anObject is the name
of the object declared.
However, it looks to me like thats just a typo.
Also, make sure that MyProtoConformingClass inherits from NSObject (or
a subclass of NSObject), because thats where release, autorelease,
retain are implemented.
Yes, it does inherit from NSObject. But the warning remains.
--
A
„r„p„|„‘
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Student-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
