Peter O'Gorman writes:
> Mike Kelsey wrote:
> > Is there an option I can give to |libtool| or/and |ld|, such that dependent
> > libraries mentioned inside .dylib's will be resolved via the -L options?
>
> See -dylib_file in the ld(1) manpage.
Thanks. I was afraid of that: -dylib_file has to be specified for each
library individually (if I read ld(1) correctly), which means I need to know
on a case-by-case basis which libraries are involved. In that case, I might
as well simply list those libraries with -l options directly, and let the -L
take care of them.
-- Michael Kelsey
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Unix-porting mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
