> We use these frequently with good results. I believe the FTDI driver is
> primarily used to extend the typical CDC/ACM model to include "bitbanging" the
> pins for other uses.
Does this mean that for ordinary serial communications, the FTDI driver is
unneeded and a built-in Apple driver is used?
Would that also be the case for the Prolific devices? (If so, I would want
to remove their driver and re-test.)
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Usb mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden