Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DreamHost reliability (Was: Web hosting short list)




On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:

On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Bill wrote:

That is just nonsense. I have been using Dreamhost for over 6 years and have been up and running 99.9% of the time. 5 nines it is not, but then who is?

By my math, 99.9% uptime would be less than nine hours downtime in a year. On July 22, the entire DreamHost data center went down for almost nine hours. The next day, their entire network went down for twenty minutes. Yesterday, their entire network went down for five minutes. That's already less than 99.9% download for the year, only looking at the past week. I don't know about the previous five years, but DreamHost has not had 99.9% uptime this year. That's not according to me; that's according to DreamHost. You can read it yourself:


http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/

Unlike many other hosts, DreamHost has no uptime guarantee, so they're not even claiming to be reliable.


Any host that tells you they have an uptime guarantee is lying to you. I used to be a systems administrator at a hosting company. We averaged around 97% uptime on our windows servers. While some of that was patching, most of it was downtime from our upstream provider. There were a few cases where verio and uunet were both down and we had no internet connection. Another thing i've noticed on this thread is that people assume a hosting company is down when they can't get to them. What about traceroutes? Sometimes its just your path to the hosting company that is down and not the host itself. Our main hosting box showed 98.4% uptime internally. 99.9% is not possible unless the company has more than 3 upstream providers, ups/generators, never patches their operating systems, and does not cluster.


When you look for a hosting company, security should be just as important as price. No one wants a hacked website. Its bad for business. Most hosting companies have very old versions of software like apache, php, and so on. Take that into consideration. It doesn't matter what operating system the company uses. Mac OS X can be vulnerable just as linux, windows, solaris or freebsd can. My former employer was hacked at least once a year through the dns server or one of the linux servers. Luckily none of my windows servers were rooted, but I had to do serious patching and constant monitoring.


Lucas Holt email@hidden ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) FoolishGames.net (Enemy Territory site)


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Web-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/web-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Web hosting short list (From: Michael Ghilissen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Web hosting short list (From: Bill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Web hosting short list (From: Scott Reynen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Web hosting short list (From: Bill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: DreamHost reliability (Was: Web hosting short list) (From: Scott Reynen <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.