Finally, I have zero criticsm for FrontBase or PostqreSQL ....
just have never had a need to go there yet .... although, I am
planning to give serious playtime to both someday soon when I get
time .... especially after all the positive comments about
Frontbase and PostgreSQL here in the community.
I've mentioned it before, but my #1 gripe about PG is that there is
no viable (non-commercial) clustering solution for it. It makes it
very hard to create a fault-tolerant deployment of it, unlike MySQL
and FB. Other than that, I really like PG.
+1000, and replication options are total crap (Slony is the less
worse, and you have to rebuild the replication when you made a change
to the schema).
