I am encouraged that you got wind of some commitment from Apple. But I
don't think that should be enough to keep you or the rest of us quiet
for yet another year.
I hope I'm not coming across as a mad flamer. I sincerely think that
there is currently not a more important topic in our WebObjects world.
I also sincerely respect everyone's opinion in this thread so far - in
most cases I completely agree with them. I have just reached the point
where I think it's time for all of us to get a little more proactive.
I don't have the answer for just how to do that (be proactive), but I
know that step 1 is not accepting the status quo any longer and stop
making excuses for Apple.
I just don't see how a future "under cover" can be bright at all. I
can't be alone here, can I?
Thanks, man. :-)
Trae Nickelson
On Jun 30, 2004, at 5:35 PM, Clayton Leitch wrote:
I hate to jump into this flame world. However, I feel from the WWDC
briefings that Apple is committed to WebObjects. However, without any
real penetration into the enterprise, Apple technologies are not
accepted. I know from experience. I think WebObjects has a bright
history even if it is under cover.
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
