Hi all,
Most important it is than finally Apple defines clearly in a document
how to do it (some developer of Apple has commented which they are in
it), and the form to install a number of license, that now is made
necessary to be able to use WO outside OSX Server.
At the moment to nostoros us "they have forced" to watch in
JDeveloperes (Oracle) and NetBeans alternative, and I know other
companies in the same situation.
I do not doubt the good intentions to offer alternatives to concrete
situations, but a legal normative is necessary where the companies can
value, what interests to them.
it is not only important if he is free or no, the important thing is
that it is really multiplatform (so that the base is JAVA, we do not
forget it).
And all this from the most constructive critic, otherwise would
not be psubscribed to this list.
Thanks,
L.Caballero
El 27/11/2005, a las 16:46, David Avendasora escribió:
On Nov 27, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Well, for me the "Subject to the terms and conditions of this
License, you may use, install and permit others to access the
WebObjects deployment software included with the Developer
Software to deploy application programs developed using Apple’s
WebObjects Software." sentence is very clear.
Well, I hope you are right. If so this will make my life much
easier! I guess we'll just have to wait on the response that
Stephan gets back from Apple.
Dave _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lucaba%
40gmail.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%
40anderhome.com
This email sent to email@hidden
