Hello,
I think "tone" is something that it is permissible to upgrade :-).
Maybe the negative sounding statement(s) can be moved out of the
introduction block to the proposed new "Disadvantages" section ?
The WO Wikibook introduction sounds more neutral to me in comparison:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects
A fair (ie not just WO propoganda) comaprision with Rails could
usefully be attached to the "OSS Alternatives" section.
I found one comparison in the WebObjects WikiBook. I just added some
links to the WOCOM Wiki with pros and cons to be - hopefully - fair
there also:
WO to Ruby on Rails (2005, Deirdre Saoirse Moen, Rails side)
http://deirdre.net/posts/2005/08/webobjects-to-ruby-on-rails/ and
http://deirdre.net/wp-content/extra_content/wo-to-rails.pdf
WO vs Ruby on Rails (2006, Jonathan Rentzsch, WO side)
Does anyone have these slides ?
Related: http://desperatepundit.com/blog/cremes/technology/
2006/02/15/WebObjects-versus-Ruby-On-Rails.html?page=comments
WebObjects "Myths" vs Ruby on Rails
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/
Alternative_Technologies/Ruby_on_Rails
( Location: http://www.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOCOM/
WOCOM+Marketing
)
