[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mandatory to-many?

Subject: Re: mandatory to-many?
From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:57:01 -0800
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden

I always figured it was a defect in EOF in that it did not enforce relation().count() > 0. IIRC, we added that in our validation framework. It is perfectly valid in ER modelling to have a 1..N relationship, so I would not consider this to be a model error.


Chuck


On Dec 13, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

If a relationship is marked to-many, should entity modeler disallow marking that mandatory? Should it error? Should it warn? I think at the very least it's a warning, and quite possibly should be not allowed.
ms
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill% 40global-village.net
This email sent to email@hidden

--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>mandatory to-many? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: mandatory to-many?
Next by Date: Re: Xcode and WO development?
Previous by thread: mandatory to-many?
Next by thread: References accross models
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home