|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On May 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Oddly, you know, it does.
Eh. I've been getting an earful from you people for the past 6 years. Note: I'm not sure which that says more about, my self confidence, or your inability to get rid of annoying people.
Oooooh! Yes. Much more readable.
Your lips hurt, and you know what Hugi's tongue feels like. Does Nok know about all this?
Yes, point taken there. Maybe I should change it to the Spanish: cual() which happens to be pronounced Qual, which warms the cockles of my heart. Maybe below the cockles, maybe in the sub-cockle area.
Well, I was thinking about creating them for the attributes defined as booleans... That would be pretty straight forward. The trick is knowing what the possible values are for other attributes. If that were defined in the userInfo dictionary then it should be easy to create those qualifiers. The templates read out the qualifiers defined for fetch specs as it is. They just don't make them stand-alone static variables.
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
|>More Readable EOQualifiers (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)|
|>Re: More Readable EOQualifiers (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)|
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.